http://www.worldmeets.us/images/obama.gop.gay.marriage_iht.jpg

[International Herald Tribune, France]

[Click Here for More Cartoons]

 

 

Gay Marriage in Ecuador? Let Us Hope Not! (El Universo, Ecuador)

 

“The institution of marriage is seen as legal and natural, and based solely on the union between a man and a woman. This is not just a problem of semantics or prejudice but the pure reality of the law, which is firm in its intent to reject homophobia without altering the essence of our legal institutions.”

 

By Alfonso Oramas Gross

                                             http://www.eluniverso.com/data/recursos/fotos/alfonsooramasfoto_91_91.jpg

 

Translated By Marisol Plata Fortiz

 

May 12, 2012

 

Ecuador - El Universo - Original Article (Spanish)

Obama's civil rights gamble: With an issue as fast-moving as the acceptance of homosexuality, most political strategists are flummoxed about the consequences of his public approval of gay marriage.

BBC NEWS VIDEO: U.S. Republican hopeful Romney rejects same-sex marriage, May 12, 00:01:30RealVideo

There is no doubt that President Obama’s recent decision to support gay marriage will shake up the U.S. election campaign. Little else can be expected from an issue that divides the nation in half and dilutes what is touted as political correctness within a volcano of radical positions. Here, only extreme options can coexist - such as considering gay marriage as either the threshold of hell or final redemption. Paradoxically, although the president had supported gay rights, he had remained against legalizing gay marriage, because he considered civil unions sufficient for guaranteeing such rights.

 

It is necessary to comment briefly on U.S. law regarding homosexual marriage. Civil union is defined as a lawful status that provides legal protection for same-sex couples, but only at the non-federal level [states]. At the same time, this entails a number of legal consequences such as non-recognition in other states, immigration issues, and general tax and benefit issues. The limitations of civil unions mean, at least in the United States, that the gay community sees them as offering diminished legal status in comparison to marriage.

Posted by Worldmeets.US

 

Without a doubt, Obama's statements will have a strong impact in an election year, especially taking into account the current militancy of the gay movement. In our country, although civil unions between same-sex couples are legalized, offering the same rights and obligations as families formed by marriage, it isn’t always clear that the institution of marriage is based on a union between a man and a woman. In addition to this, in Ecuador only opposite-sex couples have the right to adopt. Will there come a time in our country in which the gay community becomes dissatisfied with civil unions and begins advocating the legalization of gay marriage?

 

SEE ALSO ON THIS:
leJDD, France: Gay Marriage: Obama Puts His Finger to Political Wind
Causeur, France: Gays in the Military? … The Greeks Had it Right
Franve TV, France: Is France Behind America on Same-Sex Marriage?
NU, The Netherlands: Marriage in America: ‘Man, Woman and God’
Guardian, U.K.: How Obama's Gay Marriage Move Changes Presidential Race
CenarioMT, Brazil: Gay Marriage: 70 Years from Disease to Presidential Blessing
The Zimbabwe Mail, Zimbabwe: Obama's Gay Stance ‘Worst Form of Satanism’
La Informacion, U.S.: In Latin America, Only Argentine Leader Stands with Obama
Liberation, France: Mr. Obama and Gay Marriage: ‘Courage’
Mail & Guardian, South Africa: South Africa: Pride, Vigilance, on Gay Rights
Globa & Mail, Canada: From Obama, a Bid to Broaden Stream of American Life
Toronto Star, Canada: Obama Tilts Scales Toward Compassion and Equity
Macleans, Canada: Obama Passes the Leadership Test
Irish Times, Ireland Mr. Obama's 'Brave and Welcome' Move
Irish Examiner, Ireland: Let's Be Honest About How We Live Our Lives
Independent, U.K.: 'Full Marks' to President Barack Obama
Independent, U.K.: At last, Obama Asks U.S. to Open Door to Acceptance
Guardian, U.K. Obama's Historic Affirmation of Gay Marriage
Economist, U.K.: Good for Obama; But Bad for Gay Marriage
Telegraph, U.K.: Import of U.S. Culture War Backfires on Cameron

 

 

I hope not, since the institution of marriage is seen as legal and natural, and based solely on the union between a man and a woman. This is not just a problem of semantics or prejudice but the pure reality of the law, which is firm in its intent to reject homophobia without altering the essence of our legal institutions. What would be acceptable in terms of overcoming discrimination would be the expansion of existing legislation on civil unions, taking into account alternative relationships between people of the same sex. And added to the debate will be added, as happens from time to time, the fervor, passion and even idle talk of those who are in favor and against.

YOUR DONATION MAKES OUR WORK AS

A NON-PROFIT POSSIBLE. THANK YOU.

CLICK HERE FOR SPANISH VERSION

opinions powered by SendLove.to
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Posted by Worldmeets.US May 14, 9:47pm]

 

 

 







Bookmark and Share