A supporter
grieves at the scene of Benezir Bhutto’s murder.
Libération, France
Those Who Murdered
Pearl
and Massoud,
Killed Bhutto as Well
“It is a woman, first of all,
that they have killed. A beautiful woman. ... the exact opposite of those shamed women - hidden and damned
creatures of Satan, who are the only type of women tolerated by those apostles
of a world without women.”
By Bernard Henry Lévy*
Translated By James
Jacobson
December 28, 2007
France
- Liberation - Original Article (English)
It is a woman, first of all, that
they have killed.
A beautiful
woman.
A visible
woman - an even conspicuously, dramatically visible woman. A woman for whom it was a point of honor not only to
hold meetings in one of the most dangerous countries in the world, but to do it
with her face uncovered – the exact opposite of those shamed women, hidden and
damned creatures of Satan, who are the only women tolerated by those apostles
of a world without women.
With Daniel Pearl, they
killed a Jew.
With commander Massoud [of the Afghan Northern Alliance ] , they killed
a moderate Muslim, a literate man and a free spirit. With Salman
Rushdie ,
they tried for years to kill a man who dared to say that being human sometimes
means to choose one’s destiny.
Well with BB, Benazir Bhutto, they killed a bit of all of this. But they
also killed a woman, this woman, who was an intolerable provocation. It was the
radiance of her unveiled face, nude, defenseless and magnificently eloquent -
they killed her, because it was this woman, because it was her face - at once
powerless and with a force that can’t be replicated, because she lived her
destiny as a woman who refused the looming curse, according to these new
fascists who call themselves jihadists - against the
human face of all women; thus they killed the one who was the very embodiment
of the hope, spirit and will of democracy, not only in Pakistan, but in the
lands of Islam in general.
Pervez Musharraf was a counterfeit
adversary of al-Qaeda. He pretended to fight them while he played his double
game with his occult alliances - his way of keeping his stock of terrorists
under his elbow and releasing them one by one in dribs and drabs, all according
to the needs of the alliance with his great and complicated American friend -
he did their bidding under the table.
Benazir, if she had won, what can one say? If she had lived,
simply lived, she wouldn’t have ceased saying at the risk of her own life, her
very being, her very presence, that she was their resolute, absolute,
irreconcilable adversary; for these people she was a threat - more than just a
political one, an ontological one; she would have left them nowhere to hide.
They knew this and they killed her.
I am reminded of an afternoon
on December 2002 in London, when I investigated the death of Daniel Pearl - and
therefore this powder keg, the rear-base for al-Qaeda, even though the forward
base was already in Pakistan; Pearl was beautiful, yes; and incredibly
courageous in his will to return - whatever the cost - to that country which
had already uprooted Benezir’s two young brothers and
her father in events redolent with the air of a Shakespearian tragedy. [All
were killed under suspicious circumstances during Benazir
Bhutto’s two terms as Pakistan President].
I see again her
father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto ,
thirty-five years old, just prior to the liberation of Bangladesh and the
explosion of Pakistan where he was already Prime Minister - I remember him
again as he was, ignorant of the destiny that awaited him, elegant, refined,
Pakistani and an Anglophile, a Muslim and Westerner, living at a cultural
crossroads, a successful and natural child of two great cultural lineages –
nobody imagined then that so many forces would so quickly move to oppose him.
These people were the salt of
the Pakistani earth.
They were people who could
prevent not only that country, but that part of the world from descending into
chaos.
Benazir Bhutto is dead and it’s a bit like September 9th,
2001, the day of Massoud’s death. I cannot help but wonder about the grim
scenario that her assassins inevitably had in their minds. I cannot prevent
myself from wondering what gigantic event, another thunderclap - it may be the
prelude for.
The best way to respond is to
act, and to act quickly. The best way - the only way - to respond to this new
and terrible challenge is to immediately endow the event with all of the
symbolic importance it warrants.
In the next few days Mrs.
Bhutto will be buried in this martyr country that, more than ever, is Pakistan. Angela Merkel, George Bush, Gordon Brown and others
should be there to accompany her on this ultimate voyage.
It is important that our
president, Nicolas Sarkozy, consents to interrupt his
vacation in order to express faith in democracy and law at the heart of this
furnace, where a religion gone mad has become increasingly criminal and where –
as he imprudently said a few days ago – the hope of people is fading.
Behind the remains of this
great lady, as it was in the past behind those of Anwar
al-Sadat or Yitzhak Rabin, there should be present the greatest possible number
of heads of government and State, making her funeral a silent demonstration of
the world’s adherence to the values of democracy and peace.
But Benazir
Bhutto was neither a head of state, nor of government? That’s true. But she was
much more. She was a symbol. And
henceforward she will be a standard. Behind her name will now stand all of
those who refuse to mourn the death of freedom in the land of Islam. Behind
her shroud must stand all of those who still believe that liberty will prevail
in Islam, and that the beneficent genius of the Enlightenment will prevail over
fanaticism and crime.
*Bernard Henry Lévy
is a philosopher and director of Rule of the Game magazine. He is also a shareholder and a member of the supervisory
board of Libération.
ALSO FROM THIS
AUTHOR:
Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zietung, Germany
Modern America
Through the
Eyes of a Frenchman: A Talk
With Bernard Henry Levy …
http://www.worldmeets.us/frankfurterallgemeine000005.shtml
Click for French
Version