Romney Had Best Not Listen to Bush's 'Neocon Lunatics' (Izvestia, Russia)


"People do not want to return to the now-bankrupt Republican policies of the Bush era. ... Romney uttered the words that if he wins, U.S. policy toward Russia will be less flexible and more rigid. Those words, I suspect, evoked nothing but an ironic smirk from Putin. ... If Romney’s position is to be determined by neoconservative 'lunatics' like John Bolton and Bob Kagan, his foreign policy will be as doomed to failure as Obama's most recent predecessors."


By Andranik Migranyan*



Translated By Anastassia Tapsieva


September 8, 2012


Russia - Izvestia - Original Article (Russian)

Mitt Romney: Is he too dependent on those who guided George W. Bush?


RUSSIA TODAY NEWS VIDEO: Obama or Romney: Either way, U.S. 'oligarchs' win, Sept. 8, 00:05:34RealVideo

Political scientist Andranik Migranyan on the most likely winner of the U.S. election race


The vast majority of analysts who have followed election campaigns over the last 30-40 years, consider the current election one of the dirtiest in American history. On negative television commercials alone, hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent in an attempt to depict the opposing side in the most unflattering light. As a result, the central protagonist of the Republican ads, Obama, is presented to the voters as a communist who wants to turn the U.S. into an average European country in which socialist-democratic values prevail. The least serious Republican contention is that an Obama victory would doom the U.S. to follow in the pathetic footsteps of modern Greece.


The Democrats, in turn, have directed their efforts at portraying Mitt Romney as a man far removed from the needs of the average American, and to assert that if he came to power, the economic situation would deteriorate, social services would be undercut, and the burden of leading the country out of the crisis would be borne by the middle class, the poor, and the disadvantaged.


Opinion polls show that both Obama and Romney have a chance to win, and that in the end, the margin separating the two may be minimal. Obama wins by charisma - he, unlike Romney, is favored by women and minorities (ethnic, racial, sexual, etc.) Romney, on the other hand, gives the impression of being a very rational person, devoid of charisma and appeal. Based on the principle of likability - who is beloved by the electorate - Obama is way ahead of Romney.


Romney faces another serious problem in this campaign. Until recently, analysts believed that Republicans would try to turn this election into a referendum on economic policies of the Obama Administration - and that the results of those policies are modest at best, and in many ways disastrous. But with the selection of Paul Ryan as running mate, the campaign has entered another dimension. Now Americans must choose between the Democratic and Republican programs in regard to how to emerge from the systemic crisis that America has been mired in since 2008.

Guardian Unlimited, U.K.

[Click Here for More Cartoons]


The central battleground for the candidates will be over the fate of Medicare. Both parties believe that the system needs reform, but have diametrically opposed positions when it comes to the nature of that reform. Chasing the votes of retirees, both sides are lobbing accusations at the other, claiming that the opponent’s reform would be catastrophic to both Medicare recipients and the country's economy as a whole. The American voter will be hard pressed to sort out who is right, because the system of Medicare is so complex, as is the mechanism that forms its financial basis. So as always, the average voter will have to trust in the word of a candidate from one of the two leading parties.


Like Worldmeets.US on Facebook  



Then there is the question being asked by so many U.S. political analysts: Why has Romney taken such a risky step - and altered his campaign strategy? In my view, he had good reason to do so. There was a serious danger that a negative campaign against Obama would fall short of achieving a Republican victory. Yes, many are unhappy with the results of the Obama Administration's four years in office. But even more so, people do not want to return to the now-bankrupt Republican policies of the Bush era. That is why Romney wants to convince the electorate that his party has new leaders, new ideas, and that beyond criticizing Obama, they have some alternatives to offer, too.


The current dead-heat of the candidates means that the election outcome depends largely on the televised debates. That is why in this election, Republicans must present themselves, not as a party coming to power with its old baggage, but one with new faces and new ideas, appealing to independent voters and those not affiliated with either party - the choice of whom will in fact decide the outcome of the November election.


Finally, I would like to address how Republicans view America's place in the international community. Unfortunately, up to now, the impression has been, as Talleyrand said of the Bourbons after the restoration of the monarchy, “they have forgotten nothing, and learned nothing.” The Republicans criticize Obama’s foreign policy on all fronts. The criticism is often forced and absolutely baseless. Particularly when it come to Obama’s attempts to normalize relations with other countries and U.S. allies, marred by the Bush Administration’s condescending policy of unilateral domination. In this context, it is not surprising that in this context, Romney uttered the words, clearly aimed at the average American, that if he wins, U.S. policy toward Russia will be less flexible and more rigid.


Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Those words, I suspect, evoked nothing but an ironic smirk from Putin. I doubt the Russian president cares whether U.S. policy toward Russia is more flexible or not. More important is that it is realistic - particularly for the United States. If Romney’s position is to be determined by neoconservative “lunatics” like John Bolton and Bob Kagan, if he wins, Romney’s foreign policy will be as doomed to failure as Obama's most recent predecessors Clinton and George W. Bush. The former unsuccessfully tried to marginalize and weaken Russia and eliminate it as a major player in world politics. The latter tried, futilely, to establish unequivocal U.S. lordship over the world, without considering the opinions and interests of America's partners and opponents - but also its friends and allies.


It is obvious to every realistically-minded analyst that the ambitions of neoconservative “lunatics” do not correspond with America's available “ammunition.” It is encouraging that in his former life as a businessman and Massachusetts governor, Romney proved himself a sober, careful, balanced, and responsible person. So, if he wins, I hope his foreign policy is guided by an assessment of threats to U.S. security - not of neocon “lunatics,” but of such serious people as former Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who have repeatedly stressed that the central threat to U.S. security is America's own national debt, which has reached catastrophic levels. That is why Romney would be too busy putting his own house in order rather than venturing on doubtful adventures in foreign lands. The world has changed over the last decade, and that is what whoever wins the 2012 election will have to contend with.


*Andranik Migranyan is director of the Institute for Democracy and Cooperation.


Le Figaro, France: U.S. Democrats in Combat Mode; Face Unemployment Headwind

La Repubblica, Italy: The Right to Vote Being Imperilled in America!
Al Mesryoon, Egypt: Romney: Can Such a 'Vacuous Figure' Lead the Strongest Nation?

Rzeczpospolita, Poland: Election in America: Romney Gives Poland an Opening
Neviditelny Pes, Czech Republic: If Romney Wins, He Can Keep His Radar!

China Daily, China: America's Unsettling Political 'Hate Speech'

Guardian, U.K.: Paul Ryan Sets Up Romney Stall but No One is Buying

Guardian, U.K.: Democratic National Convention 2012 - Live Coverage

News, Switzerland: 'Legitimately Raped': An Idea the Iran Regime Could Love

News, Switzerland: Cows, Pigs, Women and American Conservatives

News, Switzerland: Ryan: Romney's Libertarian Trojan Horse May Bolt

Globe & Mail, Canada: History Does Not Bode Well for GOP's New Pick
Die Zeit, Germany: Ex-Mormon Missionary Romney's Europe Gaffes Were Calculated

The Observer, U.K.: In Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney Makes Risky and Divisive Choice

Economist, U.K.: Romney Makes his Choice

Le Figaro, France: Why the U.S. Presidential Campaign Has Gone to the Dogs
Amal al-Oumma, Egypt: Egyptians Can Learn from American Presidential Race

Le Figaro, France: Ann Romney and Michelle Obama: The Battle for FLOTUS Begins

Economist, U.K.: Romney's 'Fake' Woman Problem

Gazeta, Russia: ‘Hysteria’ over Romney’s ‘Flattery’ of Russian Influence

Le Monde, France: The Misery of the 'Electoral Circus'

Le Figaro, France: Lunatic Fringe Runs Romney’s Nomination Campaign

News, Switzerland: Study Reveals that Facts Don't Matter to U.S. Conservatives
San-in Chuo Shimpo, Japan: World Hopes Republican Spat Improves Policies
Le Figaro, France: America’s ‘Right’ Makes the French Right Seem ‘Left’
News, Switzerland: Rick ‘Ahmadinejad’ Santorum
Hindustan Times, India: Santorum: 'Prince of Sanctimony'
Jeune Afrique, Senegal: 'Oddball Extremist' Santorum Could Make Obama's Day
NRC Handelsblad, The Netherlands: Santorum Wrong on Euthanasia in Netherlands
Jornal De Negotios, Portugal: Taxes: Warren Buffett, His Secretary, and the Grocer
Gazeta, Russia: America's Young People Turn Against 'Patriotic Bravado'
Le Figaro, France: Gingrich Success Reflects Republican 'Personality Disorder'
Tokushima Shimbun, Japan: State of Union Sends 'Wrong Message' to Pyongyang
Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Germany: America: 'Land of Inequality'
Liberation, France: It is 'Yes We Can' in America Once More
Liberation, France: Finally, Obama Chooses Combat Over Conciliation
FAZ, Germany: U.S. Republican 'Civil War' Proving Hopelessly Divisive
Der Tagesspiegel, Germany: The Republicans: Right Where Obama Wants Them
Nachrichten, Austria: Newt: America's 'Hypocritical Moralizing Apostle'
Diario de Cuyo, Argentina: Chavez and Obama: A Common Electoral Challenge
China Daily, China: Republican Race 'Hijacks' China-U.S. Relations
Diario de Cuyo, Argentina: Chavez and Obama: A Common Electoral Challenge
News, Switzerland: Romney's Core Presidential Competency: 'Shameless Lying'
Samidoon, Palestinian Territories: 'Thank You Newt: Your Insolence is Required!'
Le Quotidien d’Oran, Algeria: Gingrich's 'Fervent' Wish: 'Final Solution' for Palestinians
FTD, Germany: U.S. Republicans Must Expunge 'Radicalism' and Choose Romney
Komsomolskaya Pravda, Russia: Putin is Better than Goldman Sachs
Liberation, France: Democracy Crippled: Economics Replaces Separation of Powers
El Pais, Spain: Occupy Wall Street: Will it Help or Hinder Reelection of Obama?





blog comments powered by Disqus




















































[Posted by Worldmeets.US Sept. 9, 2:49am]




Bookmark and Share